ALL INDIA IIT FACULTY ASSOCIATION OPPOSES ENTRANCE EXAM CHANGES THAT HRD MINSITRY IS TRYING TO IMPOSE ON IITS.. TIME FOR IIT ALUMNI FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD TO UNITE AND OPPOSE THIS MOVE WITH ALL OUR MIGHT.
“ a compromise formula which includes a proposal to take top 20% students based on percentile ranking of respective boards for preparing the merit list”
How meaningless is this solution ?. Higher education in India will become the domain of the school toppers and Children of affluent parents and we wonder why half a million students leave India to study undergraduate courses overseas. Children who will never return to a country that shunned them.
Is this is what we call inclusive in RTE ?.
God Save India
Inclusive education does not mean that everyone must enter, or pass out from, an IIT. It only means that if you wanted to, you could have a shot at it. The child labourer is excluded because she can never dream of entering an IIT; she may absolutely hate IIT, but not trying to join an IIT should be her decision. Even if there is only one IIT train, every child must have access to the platform where the train comes. Of course, not everyone will get on to the train but everyone knows what to do to have a shot at the train. This is called inclusion in education. Everyone must go to school till class 12; those who work hard, and are willing to work harder still, will join an IIT. Others will, by choice, decide not to work that hard and become economists.
Shubhashis Gangopadhyay
All children are born equal and mindless politicians are trying to grade the children and youth of the nation and create a new Brahamanical Caste system in Education, which is pandering to the neo rich who can afford to send their children to elite private schools and Coaching schools.
"HRD Ministry of India wants to build castles of higher education on the bamboo scaffoldings of its schools" ~ Satish Jha
Search This Blog
"Do you support the effort of Government of India to introduce a Common Engineering Entrance Examination scrapping IIT-JEE which would eventually dilute the IIT Brand?"
Friday, January 18, 2013
481 - 500 IIT-M students yet to be placed, 2nd phase of placements on
480 - States unwilling to join new IIT-JEE format
479 - IIT undergraduate fee hiked from Rs 50K to Rs 90K per year
478 - Short on faculty, IITs look towards students
477 - HRD minister steps in to boost quality in IITs, IIMs
This came at a recent meeting held by Human Resource Development Minister MM Pallam Raju with the heads of these premier technical and management institutes here.
During the meeting, the minister observed that the directors of these institutes were more concerned with their problems like difficulties in getting land from the state governments for setting up of permanent campus, utilisation of funds and purchase of equipments.
“The minister asked the directors to concentrate more on the academic matters like teaching, getting good faculty, industry linkage and enhancing research output,” sources in the HRD Ministry told Deccan Herald. The Centre established eight Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and six Indian Institutes of Management (IIM) during 11th Five Year Plan in order to create more quality professionals.
“However, they are yet to start yielding the desired results as they continue to focus more administrative issues than achieving academic excellence,” sources added.
Some of these institutes are yet to get adequate land for permanent campus while others, which have got land, are yet to finalise the master plan for the main campus. While the land has been handed over to IIT Mandi partially, the master plans are not ready for IIT-Jodhpur and IIT-Ropar.
Civil construction work of the departments and labs is to start at the sites meant for IITs in Bhubaneswar, Gandhinagar, Jodhpur and Ropar. Among the new IIMs, IIM Ranchi is yet to get the land from the state government.
The directors feel that permanent campus would help their institutes enhance the academic and research activities. However, the minister, during the meeting, suggested that being academicians, they should focus more on academic issues and administrative issues like setting up of permanent campus should be handled by the registrar and other officials of their institutes, sources added.
476 - New IITs fail to make the grade just four years after they were created
- IIT panel proposes 80% fee hike for undergraduates
- IIT council to meet to clear confusion over new entrance exam format
- IIT-Delhi joins the rebellion going one step ahead
Thursday, January 17, 2013
474 - No invite, PSUs keep from IIT-B
|
Published: Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012, 6:30 IST
By Pallavi Smart | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA
|
|
Some students, who got job offers last year during the campus placements, are yet to hear from the companies about their joining dates even after getting an offer letter. Considering the situation, the IITs have not invited any PSUs for placements this year.
In September, the court in an interim order vacated a stay granted on the PIL. The job offers are subject to the final decision of the court.
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
473 - Mock tests for students taking IIT entrance examination
Mock tests for students taking IIT entrance examination
472 - Fakes break into IIT, trigger ID verification crackdown
New Delhi, November 24, 2012
“Because of the number of students involved, you can’t be completely sure that others haven’t slipped in using this technique,” Reddy said. “We don’t want to leave anything to chance.”
About 10,000 students were admitted to the IITs and the Indian School of Mines (ISM) Dhanbad based on their scores in the JEE 2012.
This is the first time the IITs have detected this kind of admissions fraud -- after students have secured seats through the online counseling the institutes conduct after the JEE results are announced -- and the impersonation carries shades of the plot of 2009 blockbuster 3 Idiots.
Previous fraud cases have involved impersonation in the JEE and were detected at that stage. But the 2012 cases point to a novel strategy to perpetrate fraud, which IIT officials believe includes candidates who clear the JEE and then possibly sell their admit cards – the primary document used by the institutes to verify the identity of candidates.
The Institutes have kept their discovery of the fraud and their follow up action – including an FIR filed against one of the fraud students -- a closely guarded secret, even from the human resource development (HRD) ministry.
The Joint Admission Board (JAB) of the IITs – the highest admissions-related body of the institutes – has decided that a JEE 2012 team will randomly scrutinize first year students when they appear for their first semester internal examinations, Reddy said.
These examinations – and the identity check -- have started at different IITs. Students appearing for the internal tests are being checked against photos in admit cards issued by the IITs for the JEE. But students aren’t being told the reasons.
The IITs caught the fraud students -- a boy who claimed admission to IIT Bhubaneswar and a girl who even joined ISM Dhanbad – when they physically came to their campuses after selecting seats through the online counseling.
“There was a mismatch between their digital thumb imprints and those of the candidates who cleared the JEE,” Reddy said.
Thumb imprints are recorded when candidates appear for the JEE. Though admission officials are expected to match these imprints with the imprints of students when they actually come to claim their seats after clearing the entrance test, IIT administrators admit that they aren’t convinced about the rigour followed in this process.
"The truth is that we only really rely on thumb imprints if we suspect anything wrong after looking at admit cards," an IIT Director said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Both the fraud candidates caught by the IITs had scanned the admit cards of other, successful, JEE takers, and digitally altered photos on them.
“We believe that they hoped to then formally apply for a legal ‘name change,’ switching to their actual names, to complete the fraud,” an IIT Madras administrator aware of the case said.
The IIT Bhubaneswar boy ran away from the campus with his bags after he was confronted about the fingerprint mismatch. His suspicious behaviour prompted a full-fledged investigation by the IITs, in which they confirmed that the photo on the admit card he produced for admissions did not match the one the Institutes had on the admit card they issued.
But the ISM Dhanbad girl challenged the IITs when they questioned her identity, and only accepted her fraud after the institutes filed an FIR against her and the police began their investigation.
The girl withdrew her admission from ISM Dhanbad as a part of a deal agreed to by the IITs in exchange for the institutes withdrawing the FIR.
The IITs have frequently over the past years caught candidates impersonating others in the JEE, including even the son of former IIT Kharagpur Director Shishir Dube.
Instances of more routine cheating during the entrance test are also common but the candidates are usually caught and barred from the test, making those extremely risky routes to adopt in defrauding the IIT admissions system.
But the strategy employed by the fraud students this year points to new tactics that officials described as “more worrying” than what they usually see, because it involves students – and not just the exam taker – adopting a fake identity for four years.
The attempts by the fraud students resemble the role played by Bollywood star Aamir Khan in 3 Idiots.
Khan’s character, a brilliant but poor boy, impersonates the academically weak son of a rich businessman at an engineering college modeled on the IITs for a win-win deal – Khan gets to study, and the rich boy gets a prestigious degree.
About 4.5 lakh students appear for the IIT-JEE each year, competing for 10,000 seats at the 16 IITs and ISM Dhanbad. The chance at success in the IIT entrance examination – one in every 45 applicants – is lower than that at Ivy League universities and even the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), on which the IITs are modelled.
The IITs are viewed as gateways to successful careers across India.
But student aspirations – often bordering on desperation – coupled with the intense competition for seats, have also created fertile ground for newer and newer kinds of admissions fraud.
471 - Do you think IITs should hike fees by 80 per cent or more than that?
| Student's corner |
| Business Standard / Mumbai Nov 22, 2012, 02:01 IST |
Dear Students,
LAST WEEK WE ASKED: Do you think IITs should hike fees by 80 per cent or more than that?
OTHER RESPONSES:
There are two categories of brilliant students who get into IITs. They are the meritorious ones and the students belonging to SC/ST/OBC category. Currently, the engineering education over there are highly subsidized because the professors over there are paid their salaries by the government. Considering the fact that IITs are the top institutes in India, a fee hike from their side would deprive the students of their opportunities in perusing their professional carrier. This would result in the IITs becoming like the private institutions that are in need of money, thereby diluting their image in the market.
Given the value of education imparted by IITs, a higher than 80 per cent fees hike too would have stood justified. The highly subsidized fees that prevailed were to facilitate the students to use their expertise for the development of the country. Given that most students who clear IIT Entrance are from affluent families, many of whom prefer to migrate to the west if given a chance; and the remuneration that an IIT degree gives you, the fees hike is requisite. However government should make sure to award scholarships to economically backward students so that they aren't adversely affected by the fees hike.
If one has to look at the quality of education that is imbibed in students at IIT, the proposed fee hike by 80% seems quite reasonable. Given the level of inflation in the country, it is but natural the same would also affect the teaching staff that has contributed to the growth of the IITs through their yeoman's service put in all these years. There is a chance that the same teaching staff may move over to private institutions that offer better pay packages thereby causing more damage to the IITs.
I strongly disagree with the suggested hike in the fees of IITs. Firstly, there are some fields like healthcare, education, security, woman empowerment etc , which are the moral responsibility of government, so education (whether primary or higher or professional) must be within the reach of a common man. Secondly, if IIMs are charging high fees , their fees should be reduced instead of increasing the fees of IITs. Even today we can see many kids from underprivileged segment are not able to get the right opportunity even if they have the ability.
The suggested fee hike is right on the ground that the annual budget of the IITs consistently increasing, because of inflation, with no corresponding increase in their income. Increasing tuition fees is the only way for the IITs to make up for the huge deficit. If approved, the proposed increase in the fee will not influence students from the Schedule Caste, Scheduled Tribe and OBC quota. It is only meant for the general category students. The proposed fee of Rs 90,000 per annum is still way less than the good private institutes.
The fee hike at IIT’s would give way for the other private Institutions to hike their fees according to their own whims and fancies. As such the ratio of students aspiring to be engineers and the number of IIT’s across the country is so disproportionate that many need to be contended with pursuing their degree in private colleges only. The proposed fee hike would only be an additional financial burden to the parents of the students who aspire to be future engineers and nothing else.
It is much needed for triumph educational institution like IIT to hike their fees as per current global standard. It will reduce burden on the government and will provide financial independence to the institute to invest more on technology and education. As far as the students from economically weaker section are taken into consideration, scholarship by the government should be provided to the needy.
IITs should increase its fees to some extent and if possible it can go beyond the 80 per cent mark. If we compare IITs with other top engineering college in USA the fees of IITs is very negligible compared to them. Increasing fees will help IITs to maintain its budget so that it can retain quality faculties as well as can invest more on research. Although hiking fees may have some burden to the student of those lower income families but in order to protect the interest of IIT and maintain its quality IITs should increase its fees.
If the fees of IIT colleges are hiked,then only rich students can afford to take admissions in IIT colleges. Students prefer IITs over other colleges because they provide quality education at nearly the same or lower fees than several private institutes. It would be difficult for meritorious students to get admission into IITs for the sake of higher fees. Instead of hiking the fees, authorities of IITs can ask students to pay after they get jobs for the development of the IITs.
IIT fees hike is totally reasonable. The average salary of an IITian is at least Rs. 7-8 lakh. So if the student has taken an education loan they would be able to repay the loan in a couple of years. The salaries of IIT faculty members and staff have gone up by nearly 70 per cent since sixth pay commission was introduce recently, so the institutes wants to balance every expenditures. I positively agree with the panel of IIT institute for hike up fees and optimistically parents is totally not oppose to an hike, because IIT gives worth it on that fees.
IITs are making foray into diverse subjects and the 80 per cent fee increment will provide some relief to the cost incurred per IIT student. IITs are dependent on government grants and hence are controlled by the government. Moreover, students admitted to the premier institution can avail easy loans. Merit based scholarship is provided to one third of the students who can’t afford the fees. But raising more than 80 per cent will give the economically downtrodden a run for their money stressing the fact that IITs are ‘Institutes of National Importance’ representing the assiduous Indian youth irrespective of their socio-economic condition.
Even a fourfold increase in the fees would not make IIT education beyond the realms of the common man because students whose parental income is less than Rs 4.5 lakh and those belonging to backward sections are given exemption even upto 100 per cent. When Rs 1-2 lakh is the average money spent on IIT-JEE coaching by aspirants, the new fee structure is not a botheration. Private colleges taking cue of this situation must be prevented. While financial independence for IITs is one thing, the government must increase the allocation of research grants to the premier institutes to become truly world class.
The proposed increase in the fee will not affect students from the Reserved category. Secondly, it will give IITs more financial independence from the government. Since the average salary of IITians are roughly Rs eight lakhs they will be able to repay the loans in couple of years. We should also remember that fee include not only academic but also include hostel fee and multitude of other facility which student avail at IITs. Lastly IITs already offer highly subsidized education which is not linked to inflation and other extraneous factor at all.
There are two aspects to the increase in fee. Firstly hiking the fee is good as it will make the IITs financially a little better and less dependent on government funding. However the second aspect is that hike would burden students, as in recent period more students from lower classes are taking admission to IITs. But if fee hike is taken to cover the increase in operational cost of IITs, a special loan scheme should be worked out so that students have the option of paying back the extra burden after they finish their course and find employment.
IITs are the entry ticket to the arena of world-class facilities along with a lifelong tag of being a part of it. But with hike in fees this entry ticket would be expensive. But with ample fringe benefits, impressive average salary figures along with ease in availability of bank loans, this wouldn't be a big deal for those aspirants who spend plenty of money in coaching institutions for its preparation. It would also help IITs to achieve financial independence and cope up with price hike of facilities.
470 - Govt sticks to single entrance plan for engineering colleges
Govt sticks to single entrance plan for engineering colleges
469 - Government to go ahead with JEE
Government to go ahead with JEE
Special Correspondent468 - IIT alumni discuss changes to JEE with new HRD minister
Mumbai, November 17, 2012
The alumni had sought an appointment to raise the issue of the controversial changes to the Joint Entrance Exam (JEE) for entry into the IITs from next year. The alumni had contended that the changes went against previous court orders and that there were inherent flaws in the system.
The delegation that met the minister released a note after Friday's meeting saying they would follow up in a week, adding that the minister had heard them out and promised to look into the issues.
"[He] promised to give a fresh visit to the issues concerning the IITs, including controversial changes inducted in JEE by his predecessor," said the note from the alumni.
"He showed inclination to take actions which are in the interest of all the stakeholders of the IIT system. Without commenting, either way, on rolling back of the misdirected changes brought in JEE, he promised to give a patient hearing on the issues concerning IIT autonomy, including JEE."
In July, the IITs had agreed to a two-part exam and the use of board exam marks as an eligibility and not admission criterion. It was decided that from next year students would have to clear both exams and be within the top 20 percentile of successful candidates in their Class 12 board to get admission.
The alumni had vehemently opposed the ministry's attempts at changing the JEE. Finally, a compromise formula had been reached, with the IITs agreeing to a two-part exam with board marks as an eligibility, not an admission criteria.
467 - CBSE to conduct joint entrance exam in April
466 - While Indian universities stagnate, those in China are becoming engines of growth
In the latest annual rankings of the world’s 200 best universities by Times Higher Education (THE), there’s not a single Indian name. Shocking? Then here’s the surprise: 15 Asian universities figure in the same survey as the rising stars of global higher education — two from China, three from South Korea, four from Japan, four from Hong Kong, one from Singapore, and one from Taiwan. Put the two facts together, and you get a pretty good idea of what the new class is going to be like.
Japan, of course, has been for long a respected presence on the global academic scene and will continue to be a steady winner in future rankings. But it’s China (including Hong Kong and Taiwan), South Korea and Singapore that are making waves right now – in particular, China and South Korea – as they entrench their positions as the world’s new destinations of excellence, Western domination of global higher education, still unquestioned, could begin to feel the pinch.
In the THE rankings, universities are judged for teaching quality, research activities, knowledge transfer, and international outlook. If, against these criteria, the National University of Singapore could occupy the 29th position in the 2012-13 survey, the University of Hong Kong the 35th, Peking and Tsinghua Universities in China the 46th and 52nd places, respectively, Seoul National University the 59th slot and Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology the 68th, the future shouldn’t be hard to read.
Even more remarkable is the strength of the determination to excel. The National University of Singapore, for example, moved up 11 notches from a year ago, while Tsinghua and Seoul National jumped 19 and 56 places, respectively, in a single year. Academic circles in the West believe a bigger Asian presence in the global league is only a matter of time.
Where exactly does India stand? A year ago, India was nowhere even among the world’s 300 best, and Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Mumbai had a presence in the 301-350 band. In 2012-13, IIT Kharagpur appeared in the 226-250 bracket, IIT Mumbai advanced into the 251-275 range, while IIT Roorkee sneaked into the last of the ranking categories, 351-400. There’s a movement, yes, but still a very tentative one.
What’s the secret that the Chinese and the Koreans know and we don’t? Simply put, it’s their desire to blend pure academic pursuits with down-to-earth R&D, go the extra mile to woo international talent, open up channels of international cooperation, and turn universities into laboratories of national development.
Working towards this end, and encouraged by their governments, universities in the two countries have undergone a character change that foreign students and professors find increasingly hospitable, as do foreign corporations looking across borders for partnerships in problem-solving research.
Both countries have been pumping huge amounts of money every year into research and higher education. South Korea, where the private sector accounts for almost 74 per cent of all R&D spending, has a funding programme called the “World-Class University Project” that encourages universities to establish new academic departments and host international scholars for collaborative research. China treats its universities and research institutes as “engines of growth”, expecting them to function as idea machines to serve specific industry needs.
It’s not a surprise therefore that foreign professors and students are as welcome in China as multinational corporations seeking to expand R&D alliances in the country. IBM, Intel, Microsoft, and many other foreign firms have substantial collaborative arrangements with Chinese universities. China’s own R&D spending, coursed mainly through its universities and research institutes, was up 23 per cent to $139.2 billion in 2011, which meant a steady rise of 20 per cent on average for the sixth straight year.
Until as late as 1993, exchanging students, swapping information, and attending international conferences were the primary modes of China’s international academic collaboration. Things began to change when a new law was introduced that year on the future of science and technology in the country. Beijing’s Tsinghua University – where this year’s Nobel Prize co-winner in Chemistry, Brian Kobilka, is a guest professor – reflects how this change is affecting Chinese academia. In 1950, Tsinghua only had 14 foreign students on its rolls, all from Eastern Europe. In October last year, 3,450 international students from 112 countries were studying there. In recent years, it has been particularly aggressive in seeking R&D collaborations with international partners, widening the scope it offers for practical research and enhancing its appeal among students and teachers alike.
A typical example is a new lab that BT, a leading provider of communications services, is setting up at Tsinghua to undertake joint projects in areas like the business application of cloud computing. The purpose is as much to provide a bridge between Chinese innovation and BT technology as to develop new global patents that will give both China and BT a better competitive advantage.
|








