“ a compromise formula which includes a proposal to take top 20% students based on percentile ranking of respective boards for preparing the merit list”

How meaningless is this solution ?. Higher education in India will become the domain of the school toppers and Children of affluent parents and we wonder why half a million students leave India to study undergraduate courses overseas. Children who will never return to a country that shunned them.

Is this is what we call inclusive in RTE ?.

God Save India

Inclusive education does not mean that everyone must enter, or pass out from, an IIT. It only means that if you wanted to, you could have a shot at it. The child labourer is excluded because she can never dream of entering an IIT; she may absolutely hate IIT, but not trying to join an IIT should be her decision. Even if there is only one IIT train, every child must have access to the platform where the train comes. Of course, not everyone will get on to the train but everyone knows what to do to have a shot at the train. This is called inclusion in education. Everyone must go to school till class 12; those who work hard, and are willing to work harder still, will join an IIT. Others will, by choice, decide not to work that hard and become economists.

Shubhashis Gangopadhyay


All children are born equal and mindless politicians are trying to grade the children and youth of the nation and create a new Brahamanical Caste system in Education, which is pandering to the neo rich who can afford to send their children to elite private schools and Coaching schools.

"HRD Ministry of India wants to build castles of higher education on the bamboo scaffoldings of its schools" ~ Satish Jha

Search This Blog

"Do you support the effort of Government of India to introduce a Common Engineering Entrance Examination scrapping IIT-JEE which would eventually dilute the IIT Brand?"

Saturday, June 2, 2012

165 - IIT, now a more distant dream? - Deccan herald


IIT, now a more distant dream?

Baishali Adak, Jun 1, 2012 :
Study wise


After Delhi University, the premiere Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) are gearing up for big change. 






The HRD minister Kapil Sibal has declared that from next year onwards there wouldn’t be one IIT-JEE but two exams JEE-Main and JEE-Advanced.

JEE Main will be a screening exam only and give 50 per cent weightage to Std XII board results.

The JEE-Advanced results, thereafter, will determine an aspirant’s admission to not only the IITs but all the government-run engineering colleges in India. In short, there will be no separate exam for admission to non-IIT engineering institutes from 2013 onwards.

Even though the minister put forth these changes with the stated aim of lessening the pressure on engineering aspirants, restoring the importance of school board exams and reducing the importance of engineering coaching institutes, teachers, IIT aspirants and their parents say that it will do the exact opposite.

In fact, the IIT Alumni Association has declared that it may appeal to court against the proposed move.

The first point of objection is 50 per cent weightage to Std XII board exam results at the JEE-Main level. At the moment one requires 60 per cent marks in Std XII to be able to sit for IIT-JEE exam, but no weightage is given in the IIT-JEE result as such. BK Mishra, academic director at IIT Study circle, a coaching institute says, “This is not right.

There are so many state board students who are not able to do well in Std XII for various reasons but have a scientific brain and do very well in engineering exams.

Besides state board students, even CBSE students who are not very good in languages score poorly in Std XII but due to their mathematical and analytic capabilities come out with flying colours in IIT-JEE. Why disadvantage these students?”

He recalls the case of one of his students who scored mere 45 per cent in Std XII Bihar board exams but did well in the IIT entrance and is today a senior official in Reliance.

Professor Rajiv Singh, who teaches Physics at Narayana, another coaching institute in Delhi, fully agrees with Mishra and cites another problem area in Sibal’s proposal. “As per the new pattern, there will be only one exam for all government engineering institutes.

What if a child, for any reason, is unable to give or do well in this one exam? He will be left with no other option like AIEEE, UPTech or anything like that. Moreover, there are only two attempts allowed in IIT-JEE. So if the child is unable to do well in these two exams, he or she will have to forget his or her engineering dreams for life.”

He makes another relevant point against the new model, “With the IIT-JEE exam splitting into two, students will feel the need for more training, and coaching institutes will mushroom all over the country as they have for UPSC. Only the minister knows what he thought when saying that this model will con­trol the growth of coaching institutes.”

Besides teachers, IIT aspirants and their parents are also unhappy with the proposed pattern. Yamini Kandpal, a student of Std XII at Holy Child (Vasant Vihar) says, “I think my stress levels have already shot up.

Till now, I was concentrating more on IIT preparation than Std XII exams as the syllabus patterns are very different. But now, I will first have to focus on Std XII boards and then IIT. In fact, my father has told me, I can drop a year after XII and prepare for IIT separately, but dropping a year was not really what I wanted to do.”

Her father GB Kandpal adds, “It might cost me a bit more - extra coaching and the loss of one year of my child, which I hope will not happen but the ultimate aim is to make her a successful engineer. The authorities have their policies.

We will just have to work harder and find a way around them.” So much for the dream of engineering.