“ a compromise formula which includes a proposal to take top 20% students based on percentile ranking of respective boards for preparing the merit list”

How meaningless is this solution ?. Higher education in India will become the domain of the school toppers and Children of affluent parents and we wonder why half a million students leave India to study undergraduate courses overseas. Children who will never return to a country that shunned them.

Is this is what we call inclusive in RTE ?.

God Save India

Inclusive education does not mean that everyone must enter, or pass out from, an IIT. It only means that if you wanted to, you could have a shot at it. The child labourer is excluded because she can never dream of entering an IIT; she may absolutely hate IIT, but not trying to join an IIT should be her decision. Even if there is only one IIT train, every child must have access to the platform where the train comes. Of course, not everyone will get on to the train but everyone knows what to do to have a shot at the train. This is called inclusion in education. Everyone must go to school till class 12; those who work hard, and are willing to work harder still, will join an IIT. Others will, by choice, decide not to work that hard and become economists.

Shubhashis Gangopadhyay

All children are born equal and mindless politicians are trying to grade the children and youth of the nation and create a new Brahamanical Caste system in Education, which is pandering to the neo rich who can afford to send their children to elite private schools and Coaching schools.

"HRD Ministry of India wants to build castles of higher education on the bamboo scaffoldings of its schools" ~ Satish Jha

Search This Blog

"Do you support the effort of Government of India to introduce a Common Engineering Entrance Examination scrapping IIT-JEE which would eventually dilute the IIT Brand?"

Saturday, May 19, 2012

147 - Liberalise Education - India Today

G. Viswanathan  May 18, 2012 | UPDATED 19:07 IST

Founder and Chancellor of VIT University G. Viswanathan.

Education should be kept away from politics. Wherever you have more regulations, you will also have more corruption. That is why private universities were propagated in the first place; to build an environment away from the trifling matters faced in public colleges.

But the little autonomy private universities enjoyed is gradually being eroded. The set of New Regulations introduced by UGC in 2010 is a perfect example of this. Five years ago, private universities petitioned the Government to receive the status of 'university' instead of 'deemed university'. No other country recognises the term 'deemed university' and it led to unnecessary misconceptions when applying for funds or collaborations. Arjun Singh, the then human resource development minister, set up the Tandon Committee to look into this. The committee recommended that private universities should be allowed to use the label of 'university' while mentioning that the status was granted under Section 3 of the UGC Act. 

UGC's New Regulations now state the label will revert to 'deemed university'. It also states that the chairman of the university trust cannot be a chancellor. It abolishes the post of prochancellor and for every new board member appointed or course added, it says permission needs to be taken from UGC. Education reforms and bills are usually about decreasing control; in India, it seems to work the other way around.

When Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) started in 1984, we aimed to be the best engineering university in terms of flexibility of courses, diversity of academic disciplines and quality of faculty. One of our first innovative ideas was to introduce a course called MA in Computer-aided Design (CAD) and Computer-aided Manufacturing (CAM). At that time, we were under University of Madras. When we sought approval for the course, the university recommended we call it MA in CAD and drop CAM. Then AICTE stepped in and asked us to call it MA in Mechanical Engineering instead. We waited almost six months for approval on just the name. Tell me then, why would any institution be motivated to enhance the quality of education?

If this country wants private universities, then we need to remove the stumbling blocks. In the US, private universities get free land and they are allowed to sell part of it to raise funds. In India, the Government gives over Rs.500 crore a year to IITs but no reward is given to private institutions. An educational institute that has succeeded in providing wholesome education should be rewarded. Only then will private universities be driven to enhance their overall quality. Private universities are needed. Not every student is lucky enough to get past the intense competition faced at top government institutes. What options do these students have then? Or what about field scholars who don't wish to be perturbed by policy hurdles each time they apply for funding? Private universities are the answer. This country needs to motivate, not hinder, the growth of these institutions. It's time that education was liberalised in India, just like industry and business.
- The writer is founder and chancellor of VIT University